It’s two assignments:
One page for assignment 1:
An annotated bibliography is a list of references selected for a literature review or experiment. For the purposes of this assignment, annotate two original research experiments or studies selected for your literature review topics, which you completed in a prior week. Two paragraphs are necessary for this assignment: Part I and Part II. Make certain sentences are clear and succinct and that one- or two- sentences describes the required element. I provided an example to fulfill the requirements, but do not reuse this example in any of your submitted work—it is included for reference only.
Part I
Summary
Purpose of study
Hypothesis
Method
Participants (number of participants)
Participants description (i.e., race/ethnicity)
Names of measures used
Name of statistical procedure (e.g., correlation, regression, ANOVA, MANOVA, etc.)
Results
Part II
What did you think were the strengths of the study?
Did you or the author note any limitations?
How is this study related to your research topic?
What research could you suggest for future studies?
Another page for assignment 2:
Assignments are always based upon the previous week’s readings (so that you have time to process them), so if you decide to do your assignments before your weekly reading, that is a sound strategy.
Indicate your positions on all of, A: abortions B: harvesting tissues, cells, or performing procedures on aborted fetuses C: When does a fetus become a person?
Write at least 600 words.
Category: Other : Other
It’s two assignments:
One page for assignment 1:
An annotated bibliography is a list of references selected for a literature review or experiment. For the purposes of this assignment, annotate two original research experiments or studies selected for your literature review topics, which you completed in a prior week. Two paragraphs are necessary for this assignment: Part I and Part II. Make certain sentences are clear and succinct and that one- or two- sentences describes the required element. I provided an example to fulfill the requirements, but do not reuse this example in any of your submitted work—it is included for reference only.
Part I
Summary
Purpose of study
Hypothesis
Method
Participants (number of participants)
Participants description (i.e., race/ethnicity)
Names of measures used
Name of statistical procedure (e.g., correlation, regression, ANOVA, MANOVA, etc.)
Results
Part II
What did you think were the strengths of the study?
Did you or the author note any limitations?
How is this study related to your research topic?
What research could you suggest for future studies?
Another page for assignment 2:
Assignments are always based upon the previous week’s readings (so that you have time to process them), so if you decide to do your assignments before your weekly reading, that is a sound strategy.
Indicate your positions on all of, A: abortions B: harvesting tissues, cells, or performing procedures on aborted fetuses C: When does a fetus become a person?
Write at least 600 words.
Assignment 1:
In 1-2 pages, using at least one reference in APA format, please answer the following question:
Topic:
Your agency’s fundraising team has developed an initial donor and prospect list. The list consists only of people that were known to the fundraising committee members. Hypothesize about the practicality and value of a list that is limited to people known to the fundraising committee and provide recommendations on how the fundraising committee can strengthen their donor and prospect list.
Assignment 2:
Assignments are always based upon the previous week’s readings (so that you have time to process them), so if you decide to do your assignments before your weekly reading, that is a sound strategy.
It is opposite day. Pick any major topic from Pence Chapter 03, and argue as persuasively as you can for the position OPPOSITE of the one you actually hold. Ideally, this assignment will help to expand your mind as you critically consider how others think and feel about the same issues about which you have strong thoughts and feelings. If you really want to challenge yourself, pick a topic about which you are particularly zealous —writing a paper arguing for the opposite of your stance will be a real challenge, and may even feel hard, or even impossible. My one caveat here is: do not broach a topic about which you may feel violated or unsafe should you argue (as convincingly as possible) for the opposite stance of how you feel.
Write at least 500 words.
This is the book : Pence, G. (2017). Medical Ethics: Accounts of ground-breaking cases (8thed.). McGraw-Hill Education.