Please select and define a case study describing an incident that adversely impacted the supply chain. It could be a situation describing product diversion, theft, and/or the distribution of counterfeit products.
Who was responsible for disrupting the chain (i.e., the ‘bad actors’ or perpetrators involved)?
Why did they engage in this activity? What was their aim, goal, or target?
What product(s) and patient(s) were impacted by the incident?
What risks and dangers did the incident cause (or could have caused)?
How was the incident identified and mitigated?
Were any fines, penalties, or legal action taken against the perpetrators?
How could the manufacturer have prevented this incident?
Category: Medicine and Health
Application Paper: “What Makes a Top 100 Hospital?” Your assignment is to visit the website of one of the top 100 hospitals on the list.
The hospital I chose is Baylor Hospital in Dallas texas, Ive also attached the questionns.
After reviewing the hospital and health system and analyzing its services and organizational structure, you are to write a paper on what you feel has made this facility a top 100 hospital.
Make sure that you use the Lindsey Application Paper Document to submit your paper that is in the Application Paper Folder in the Files Section.
Go to the Internet and find the Hospital’s Strategic Plan
Go to the Internet and find the Hospital’s Annual Report
Go to the Internet and find the Hospital’s Assessment Report(Some may have one and some may not)
Look for the answers to these questions using the Lindsey Application Paper Document, then answer the questions.
Make sure to have at least 3 references on the last page in APA Format.
For assistance in citing your information in APA Format, click on the link below for assistance.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html
Please ensure to remove the lines from the document.
Finally, please ensure to answer ALL of the questions and have at least 3 complete sentences for each of your answers.
Lastly, DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM THE WEBSITE!!
Sincerely,
Dr. Lindsey
Rubric
Week 3 Application Paper
Week 3 Application Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Page
5 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
75 pts
Full Marks
75 to >69.0 pts
Partial Credit-See Description
Met most of the requirements, required words and/or page requirements.
69 to >53.0 pts
Partial Credit-See Description
Met some of the requirements and/or submitted less than the required words and/or page requirements.
53 to >47.0 pts
Partial Credit-See Description
Did not meet some of the requirements and submitted less than the required words and/or page requirements.
47 to >0.0 pts
Partial Credit-See Description
Did not meet most of the requirements and submitted less than the required words and/or page requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Did not meet any of the Content Requirements
75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
10 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences Formatted per APA Guidelines
10 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Go to the following website, https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/do-memory-problems-always-mean-alzheimers-disease.
Post your thoughts about Alzheimer’s Disease versus the other types of conditions that could affect memory. Post your thoughts with references of about 300 words .
English Grammar correction in the entire essay, run through grammarly for example.
Correct the structure, so make it With fragments, paragraphs and sub-paragraphs (subsection)
Shorten the introduction, introduce what bioceramic materials are in the market and which one is superior for example.
Remove the pictures. No tables for example needed. REMOVE ALL pictures. If the images and tables are removed, please then remove them from the sources section and recorrect my sources and citations in the essay (the entire sources should be corrected)
Remove the methodology parts in the essay and keep the just findings and results and the conclusions.
Pay attention to WHY we use those materials and how it is more superior to other ones like resin based, more easy to use etc…. in every paragraph
Attatched is my thesis, you just need to do the assigned corrections to them.
4500 word written report which identifies a community or population experiencing (or suspected of experiencing) a health inequality, sets out a plan for a health needs assessment for this community, and then proposes a new public health intervention (supported by evidence from previous literature) to address an identified need for this community.
Part 1
Identify a population experiencing health inequality and prepare a plan for a health needs assessment, identifying how this will help to address health inequalities.
Structure the plan as a proposal, including relevant section headings, graphs / charts / maps, and reference fully.
Propose a specific intervention to tackle the key priority you expect to have identified during your HNA. This must be focused and not a generalised strategy with many different components. Provide detail on exactly what you are proposing to do and with whom. Justify why you think your intervention will be successful (refer to relevant literature and theory), and how you will measure success through evaluation.
Part 2
Summarise the challenges that are likely to be faced when: i) carrying out data collection and assessment of needs of your chosen community, and ii) implementing an intervention to address the chosen priority for action. Propose solutions or ways to manage these challenges with reference to literature.
Guidelines
Part 1
You will need to define the population experiencing health inequality. Ensure that this is a
population, population subgroup or community that can be identified as such (not a study sample). Critique the relevant literature to provide an understanding of what we currently know about this population. Provide a rationale for the needs assessment, considering the anticipated benefits, and select the appropriate approach and methodology. Select data sources and tools for data gathering. Include a plan of practical issues such as time, who might conduct the assessment, an outline of possible cost implications, steps and stages and their order (e.g. Gantt Chart), interpreting data and dissemination of findings, following appropriate processes relevant to the context.
Choose the most important priority you expect to have been identified by your HNA and then think about what sort of intervention you might be able to put into place to tackle this issue. Detail a proposal for a new intervention for your specific chosen community and refer to previous interventions, research and theory to support your proposal. Then think about how you might be able to demonstrate the success of your intervention. What will you measure, what data will be needed, and where or from whom will you collect this?
Make sure to use an appropriate title, subheadings, tables and charts.
A good proposal:
Is clear, direct and straight forward — it tells the reader what you are proposing to do and why, and does not overcomplicate issues;
Is well organised — structured so your reader can understand the “story” being told;
Provides a clear rationale — your reader goes away convinced of the need and of the proposed methodology;
Provides a design and method that makes it clear exactly what is to happen and how;
Is realistic and practical in terms of population size, cost benefit, team skills, time;
Is ethical.
Part 2
Reflect upon your proposal and identify any challenges and areas that would be faced when collecting data and assessing needs and then also when implementing the planned intervention to tackle your chosen priority. Choose key areas and explore these in some depth with reference to a strong academic evidence base. Offer some solutions to mitigate these challenges.
Week 2 Assignment: Action Research Chapter 1 Revised
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to formalize your chapter 1 given the feedback from your professor in Week 1 and begin building toward chapter 3 Methodology.
Assignment Directions
Create a title for your study that is representative of the subject or topic (i.e., title is often a derivative of the research question or the research question itself; see examples of students’ thesis papers/ARPs posted in course).
Reiterate your proposed area of study including your problem statement, rationale your research question, and your significance statement from week 1 (Revised). In addition, include the following essential specifics; review examples posted to get an idea of the detail needed for these elements:
Setting or site where study will be undertaken
The participants or population (age, range, gender, students, teachers, colleagues, etc.)
Support your chosen area of focus (problem statement and research questions) using the three sources from the week 1 paper and three additional sources (these should be peer-reviewed articles) which will serve as the basis of your literature review (Chapter Two).
Page Requirements
5-7 pages excluding the title page and references.
References
This assignment should use a minimum of 3 additional quality references (e.g., .org, .edu, peer-reviewed journals, etc.) obtained from the library and/or scholarly online sources (added on to the 6 you used in the week 1 paper). You will need your APA manual for this assignment.
Grading Criteria
This assignment is worth 10% of your grade.
Writing Studio
Please consider using the Writing Studio for feedback on this assignment. You can find directions on how to use the service in student resources.
Saving the Assignment
Please submit/attach this assignment in MS Word as LastNameResearchWeek#Course# (e.g., Davis Research Week 2 RSM551).
Due Date
Please submit this assignment by Sunday at 11:59pm EST.
Week 2 Action Research Rubric
Quality of Content (80 Points)
___/40: Reflective and critical thinking (i.e., application, synthesis, analysis, and/or evaluation) are coherently and consistently used to discuss the problem statement and research questions, setting or site of the study, and the participants or population involved in the study.
___/40: Support your chosen area of focus (problem statement and research question) using and relating at least three additional peer-reviewed sources (along with the three from week 1 paper) which will serve as the basis of your literature review (Chapter Two).
Quality of Writing (20 Points)
___/ 5: Format – Text meets APA/MSE standards.
___/ 5: Organization – Organization of paper demonstrates critical thinking. (Paper contains cover page, introduction, conclusion, headings, and effective transitions).
___/ 5: Precision – Student uses terminology and writes clearly and concisely.
___/ 5: Mechanics – Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly.
Total: 100
Choosing data to solve a problem
Welcome to Week 2!
At this point, you have chosen to either complete an action research project, or to create a formal data-based improvement plan. In both instances, there are two major challenges 1) narrowing the topic of interest into a measurable research question or specific data point to focus on, and 2) Obtaining permission from a site to conduct research (or gather data), that will give you the information you need. This week we will begin working through these areas.
This week you should begin completing the CITI Training (Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative). The CITI Training informs students about ethical and legal research standards. The training takes several hours and may be completed in more than one sitting. For IRB approval you MUST SCORE 80% or better on each module. At the conclusion of your training you will want to download your scores so you have them handy. Go to the following link: https://www.citiprogram.org to access the website, but you may also find this link under Student Resources. Take the student version (Basic Education) of the CITI Training (the student version is free) and select “Keiser University” when it prompts you for Institutional Membership. If you have questions, please contact your instructor for assistance. These modules should be completed prior to submitting your IRB Application.
This is what my teached sent to me:
when you take the course again, you will have to choose a different health issue and apply each week’s theory to it. At the and you discuss which would apply best. You uses SCT for the last paper but applied it to a completely different topic.when you take the course again, you will have to choose a different health issue and apply each week’s theory to it. At the and you discuss which would apply best. You uses SCT for the last paper but applied it to a completely different topic.
I am available to have a conversation with you about this but you need to change your topic (certainly narrow it) and do something for a DBIP or ARP that is more appropriate.
Dr. SI am available to have a conversation with you about this but you need to change your topic (certainly narrow it) and do something for a DBIP or ARP that is more appropriate.
Dr. S
in kindergarten, there was a pajama day, however i accidentally wore pajamas on the wrong day. I felt very scared and worried of judgement. But i forced myself to take off my jacket and not hide. although a minor event it profoundly shaped who i am today, made me braver/determined and shows my perseverance. connect the pajama story to the overall message of become a very determined/stronger person. make sure to show how this experience was essential to making me a more successful person
1. Describe the physical changes that occur during adolescence.
2. List and describe physical changes that occur as a child grows between the preschool and early school age. (example – what happens to size, shape etc).1. List and describe physical changes that occur as a child grows between the preschool and early school age. (example – what happens to size, shape etc).
3. Compare and Contrast:
• Gross and fine motor development
• A child’s movements at age 3, and age 6
• A child communication at age 4 and age 8
• Visual and auditory senses
• Over and under responsive
• Stabilization and visual regard
• Translation vs shift
• Static and dynamic prehension
• Precision and power grasps
• Grading vs adapting
• Abstract vs concrete thinking
• Genotype and phenotype
• Male and female physical skills capacity in adolescence
• Limbic system vs frontal lobe development in adolescence
6. Describe, define or explain the following terms:
k. Stereognosis
l. Endomorph
m. Ectomorph
n. Mesomorph
o. Synaptic pruning
A minimum use of 1 academic textbook (attached) and 3 scientific
journal articles as references for your presentation; additional literature (articles, books,
online sources, etc.) recommended but not required. Reference to doc attached some information is posted for questions and some sources you can use. In texbook also refer to “SUBSTANCE-INDUCED DISORDERS”.
It has been proposed that the field of regenerative medicine which deals with the “process of replacing, engineering or regenerating human cells, tissues or organs” should be moving towards revitalising worn-out body parts by removing all of the cells from an organ and then infusing new cells to integrate into the existing matrix in order to restore full functionality.
Discuss the idea of regeneration in this context and present an argument for or against the suggestion that all body parts should be revitalised as they get worn-out.
Your essay must be typed and should be 2 pages (Times New Roman – 12-point font – 1.5 spacing, including references) long.