Categories
Linguistics

Please follow the instructions write 2 summaries for the topic epenthesis (last

Please follow the instructions write 2 summaries for the topic epenthesis (last section) and segolates in Hebrew.
Reading is provided

Categories
Linguistics

Please make sure the service is free of plagiarism. Please use your own thoughts

Please make sure the service is free of plagiarism. Please use your own thoughts and experience while answering the question. I am uploading the module so you could connect your writing and use them for references. Please read carefully the uploaded documents and instructions before you start. In your answer, please insert a very brief introduction (what your DF entry is about), a brief “theory” part (interaction with the course content) as applies to the question, the practical part (direct answer to the question) and 1-2 concluding sentences (what you and others can learn from this). When interacting with the course content, please cite the lessons as follows: L2S17 (for Lesson 2 Slide 17). All other references (to provided sources or the ones you find elsewhere) have to be provided in APA 7 In your answer, please insert a very brief introduction (what your DF entry is about), a brief “theory” part (interaction with the course content) as applies to the question, the practical part (direct answer to the question) and 1-2 concluding sentences (what you and others can learn from this). When interacting with the course content, please cite the lessons as follows: L2S17 (for Lesson 2 Slide 17). All other references (to provided sources or the ones you find elsewhere) have to be provided in APA 7. The question I chose is:
1. Describe a specific slang, argot or professional jargon. You can use your own experiences.2. Describe a specific slang, argot or professional jargon. You can use your own experiences.

Categories
Linguistics

300 words minimum, ONLY use attached documents for reference. Kilpatrick (1999)

300 words minimum, ONLY use attached documents for reference.
Kilpatrick (1999)* disputes the claim that all languages and language varieties are potentially equal. To make this point, he writes that “to assert that all languages and all dialects ‘have the same expressive potential’ is to assert that the ukulele ranks with the cello”.
Expressive potential refers to the capacity of language to change over time; Kilpatrick is claiming that some languages are intrinsically unable to express certain concepts, while others can (like how a ukulele cannot play a bass note, because it is structurally unable to do so).
From what you have learned about the nature of language in Module 01, is this a valid comparison? Why or why not? In what ways do human languages differ from instruments? Support your reasoning with at least 2 quotes from lectures or readings from Module 01. Your response should focus on language, not instruments.
*Note: You aren’t responsible for having read Kilpatrick (1999), and indeed you do not need to do so in order to respond to this prompt. I’m simply citing it here because it’s mentioned in Lippi-Green’s book.

Categories
Linguistics

– Start by analysing the most recent speech (Obama) and then the others. – Plea

– Start by analysing the most recent speech (Obama) and then the others.
– Please make VERY CLEAR the methodolody you have used in the intruction part at the beginning.
– after each analysis of each inaugural speech, please make a table of the speech acts. The professor wants to see the analysis in a table as well with all the info.
– In the analysis of each speech, please give A LOT OF examples derived from the texts.
– Please at the end, do not forget to add the coding data in the appendix
– Analyse also analyse the speeches according to the Searle’s taxonomy of speech acts (I have added a literature reference in the document of ”Term Paper Proposal Research Trends”). Also, please check what type of linguistic elements the presidents use in their speeches ex. pronouns like ”we” etc etc
I will come back to you with extra instructions if needed 🙂 Thank you !

Categories
Linguistics

1. Draw a tree diagram that represents the internal structure (hierarchical orga

1. Draw a tree diagram that represents the internal structure (hierarchical organization) of the word untouchable.
2. Draw 2 diagrams that represent the two different meanings of the sentence: ” The astronomer saw the child with the telescope’. Make sure you indicate which reading goes with which tree.

Categories
Linguistics

the details are all in the files, please read every detail in the files in order

the details are all in the files, please read every detail in the files in order to complete the order

Categories
Linguistics

This is a statement of your academic preparation and future plans. Indicate your

This is a statement of your academic preparation and future plans. Indicate your interests and what area(s) of linguistics you intend to focus on in your studies and research. Also, indicate why you believe the UF Linguistics Department is a good match for you. Be as specific as you can. The text box in the online application accommodates one-and-a-half pages of single-spaced text, so please be mindful of the space remaining in the character counter. The essay cannot exceed the space available in the text box.
I would like to focus my area of Linguistics on : Second Language Acquisition.
My information:
B.A in English Education, University of Hail, 2004
TESOL Organizatio at University of Central Oklahoma 2014-2016
Master of Bilingual Education/ TESL, University of Central Oklahoma , USA, 2016
* I am applying to PhD in Linguistics at University of Florida. My paper should be unique , no grammar mistakes , no plagiarism at all, and no punctuation mistakes. Everything must be perfect..

Categories
Linguistics

Workshop Proposal You will provide a description of a site that could plausibly

Workshop Proposal
You will provide a description of a site that could plausibly offer your workshop, providing a rationale for
why you have chosen the site. You will identify the point of contact for the site, including all contact information. Finally, you will also write a sample e-mail of initial contact to appropriately identify personnel, introducing yourselves and “pitching” your workshop in a way that orients linguistically and pragmatically to the professional nature of the discourse.
Objectives:
(1) to gain experience researching institutions whose missions align with student
expertise.
(2) to compose a pragmatically appropriate e-mail that articulates a “pitch” for a
workshop.
Format: Submit as a word (.doc or .docx). This proposal will consist of two parts.
Part 1 will be a 600-900 (word limit is flexible) paper, which has three sections.
Section 1 will describe the workshop you intend to offer.
Section 2 will describe the site you have identified as a place where you workshop
could hypothetically be conducted. This section will summarize the mission of the
organization and to whom, specifically, in the organization the workshop is targeted.
Section 3 will provide a rationale for the suitability of the workshop to both the site
and the intended participants.
Part 2 will be a sample e-mail (2-3 paragraphs) that you would send to the appropriate contact person at the site, in which the workshop is “pitched.”
Citations: If you do cite sources, please us APA 7th ed.
Assessment: This assignment is worth 15 points. See the feedback checklist on the next page.
Checklist symbols:
+ The paper does this well
 The paper does this satisfactorily
- The paper does this but not always satisfactorily
x The paper does this poorly or not at all
1. Content (10 points)
____ The workshop is described substantively and in detail..
____ The intended site is described substantively and in detail.
____ The intended workshop participants are clearly identified and described.
____ The rationale explicates clearly the suitability of the workshop for the intended participants.
____ The e-mail demonstrates the appropriateness of the workshop for the site.
¬
3. Organization, language, and mechanics (5 points).
____ The paper is organized in a coherent and logical way.
____ The paper is written in an appropriate scholarly style.
____ The paper has been proofread/spell-checked and is free from typos and serious
errors in grammar and punctuation that impede reader comprehension.
____ The e-mail is organized in a coherent and logical way.
_____ The e-mail orients to the pragmatics of the English language when writing an
e-mail.

Categories
Linguistics

Important instructions : – if possible, norrow the scope of research to stick t

Important instructions :
– if possible, norrow the scope of research to stick to specific companies.
– 10 data are required. in this case ”data” mean campaign ads of those companies.
– Are you using video anaylsis to collect data or corpora ? please specify in the paper.
– rationale behind the contrast across US, India and China: ”why do you want to work on these three countries. Why did you choose these three? May be what hypothesis do you have?”: please specify in the term paper.

Categories
Linguistics

Consider the sentences below: She drew big squares and circles Mary met the man

Consider the sentences below:
She drew big squares and circles
Mary met the man in pajamas.
Both the sentences in (a)-(b) are structurally ambiguous, meaning there are two interpretations you can assign to each sentence. This ambiguity arises because a particular word or phrase can be interpreted to modify different phrases in each of the two sentences. In other words, both a) and b) sentences have two different constituent structures – one for each meaning/interpretation.
For EACH of the two sentences above state, in an unambiguous paraphrase, what meanings (readings) each sentence has. You should have a total of 4 paraphrases.
For each of the two sentences above, identify the constituent structure that corresponds to the different meanings each sentence has.
For each of the sentences in (a) and (b) draw TWO syntactic trees that show the different meanings that you identify in (i). Please specify which meaning is associated with each tree. You should have a total of 4 trees, one for each meaning.
——————————————————————————————————————
The following exercise tests your understanding of syntactic categories, syntax dependencies and wh-movement (you can refer to pp 212-214 in your textbook):
State what kind of phrase the underlined string of words is (hint: NP, PP?);
Turn each sentence into a a WH-question by supplying a WH pronoun for each underlined phrase and performing WH movement.
Describe what changes take place when you perform WH movement (hint: compare the word order in the declarative sentence given with the word order in the wh -question you formed).
——————————————————————————————————————
Mary does not care about the old attic
syntactic category: _______
WH-QUESTION: _______________________________________________________________
(b) Mary saw her mother’s hat in the attic.
syntactic category: _______
WH-QUESTION: _______________________________________________________________
(c) Mary saw her mother’s hat in the old garden.
syntactic category: _______
WH-QUESTION: _______________________________________________________________