The essay is about nursing leading, managing, and following in nursing.
First prompt (1 page) Using the definitions for leading, managing, and following, describe a situation on how work is organized in a clinical unit (medical-surgical unit). Who led? Who managed? Who followed? Did this happen seamlessly, or were there times when there was tension in efforts?
Second prompt (1 page).
Review a delegation decision made by a nurse related to a clinical experience in your practice setting. After reviewing the nurse practice act and professional standards, provide answers with an evidence-based rationale to the following questions:
Did the nurse make clear what was delegated? Why or why not?
Were the delegation decisions logical? Why or why not?
Were the delegation decisions made within legal and ethical parameters?
Please use 2 sources for the first page (one of the sources attached book) and 2 sources for the second page (one of those sources the attached book) Leading and Managing in Nursing by P.S. Yoder-Wise and S. Sportsman. The sources must not be older than 5 years. Must be in APA 7 style.
Category: Health Care and Life Sciences : Nursing
The essay is about nursing leading, managing, and following in nursing.
First prompt (1 page) Using the definitions for leading, managing, and following, describe a situation on how work is organized in a clinical unit (medical-surgical unit). Who led? Who managed? Who followed? Did this happen seamlessly, or were there times when there was tension in efforts?
Second prompt (1 page).
Review a delegation decision made by a nurse related to a clinical experience in your practice setting. After reviewing the nurse practice act and professional standards, provide answers with an evidence-based rationale to the following questions:
Did the nurse make clear what was delegated? Why or why not?
Were the delegation decisions logical? Why or why not?
Were the delegation decisions made within legal and ethical parameters?
Please use 2 sources for the first page (one of the sources attached book) and 2 sources for the second page (one of those sources the attached book) Leading and Managing in Nursing by P.S. Yoder-Wise and S. Sportsman. The sources must not be older than 5 years. Must be in APA 7 style.
Importance of active professional organization participation by nurses referencing the textbook
& a minimum of two other professional literature.
Identification of two professional nursing organizations you plan to join following BSN
graduation. Description of the mission, goals, advocacies, and legislations supported.
Must be APA 7 style.
Please use as one of the sources the textbook attached in files, Leading and Managing in Nursing by Patricia S. Yoder-Wise.
The additional sources must be peered reviewed and not older than 5 years (2017-2018)
Overview
In your exploration of readings this module, you will find articles of interest around the following areas: fluids, electrolytes, acid imbalances, urinary disorders, and reproductive system disorders. These may seem like unrelated systems; however, if one or more of these systems are off, our entire internal workings can be impacted. It is interesting to consider how these systems, when they are not in balance, can impact us not only physically, but also emotionally.
You should spend approximately 10 hours on this assignment.
Instructions
From the list of selected readings below, choose two with topics that you know the least about or are most interesting to you.
Then search for, read, and incorporate other readings of your choice in your area of interest that focus on fluid and electrolyte imbalances, urinary system disorders, and/or reproductive disorders. You might include:
1-2 journal articles or websites
Book chapters (past textbooks may be good options)
Your goal is to have a total of at least 60 pages of content read.
Your summary of each reading should be at least one paragraph (100-200 words) and include the following information:
All references must be cited using APA Style format. Please refer to the CCCOnline APA Citation Toolkit.
Number of pages read
Keywords you used to find the reading
A link to the reading
Why you selected the reading
The main point of the reading
Describe how the health deviations you read about alter normal physiology.
Provide your key takeaway from the reading. This could be something that made you pause, changed your thinking, supported your thinking, or made you question something.
Attach your Word document to a post in the Module 3 Discussion 2: Disease Analysis Journal discussion board. This will alert your peers and instructor that you have completed your journal assignment for this module. Remember, do not start a new document! Build on what you wrote in Modules 1 and 2.
In the last module, you explored material of your peers. Throughout the modules, you are collecting ideas, resources, and links to different sources of information. For this module you are going to find a resource that is NOT one you would recommend your peers use. Share the resource and/or link, and tell us why you think it is not a good resource.
Selected Readings
Choose two readings. All readings are available through the CCCOnline Library in CINAHL Plus With Full Text.
Dirkes, S. M. (2016). Acute kidney injury vs acute renal failure. Critical Care Nurse, 36(6), 75-76. doi:10.4037/ccn2016170
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Campbell, N. (2016). Innovations to support hydration care across health and social care. British Journal of Community Nursing, 21(Sup7): S24-S29.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Herschorn, S. (2013). Challenges in lower urinary tract and pelvic floor disorders: Where do we go from here? Canadian Urological Association Journal, 7(9/10 Suppl. 4), S208. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1629
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Köse, A., Armağan, E., Öner, N., Köksal, Ö., Mert, D. K., Özdemir, F., & Aydın, Ş. A. (2014). Acid-base disorders in the emergency department: Incidence, etiologies and outcomes. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(1), 4-9. doi:10.5152/jaem.2014.27880
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Quinlan, M. (1982). Solving the mysteries of calcium imbalance: An action guide. RN, 45(11), 50-100.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Skakkebaek, N. E., et al. (2016). Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility. Physiological Reviews, 96(1), 55.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Overview
In your exploration of readings this module, you will find articles of interest around the following areas: fluids, electrolytes, acid imbalances, urinary disorders, and reproductive system disorders. These may seem like unrelated systems; however, if one or more of these systems are off, our entire internal workings can be impacted. It is interesting to consider how these systems, when they are not in balance, can impact us not only physically, but also emotionally.
You should spend approximately 10 hours on this assignment.
Instructions
From the list of selected readings below, choose two with topics that you know the least about or are most interesting to you.
Then search for, read, and incorporate other readings of your choice in your area of interest that focus on fluid and electrolyte imbalances, urinary system disorders, and/or reproductive disorders. You might include:
1-2 journal articles or websites
Book chapters (past textbooks may be good options)
Your goal is to have a total of at least 60 pages of content read.
Your summary of each reading should be at least one paragraph (100-200 words) and include the following information:
All references must be cited using APA Style format. Please refer to the CCCOnline APA Citation Toolkit.
Number of pages read
Keywords you used to find the reading
A link to the reading
Why you selected the reading
The main point of the reading
Describe how the health deviations you read about alter normal physiology.
Provide your key takeaway from the reading. This could be something that made you pause, changed your thinking, supported your thinking, or made you question something.
Attach your Word document to a post in the Module 3 Discussion 2: Disease Analysis Journal discussion board. This will alert your peers and instructor that you have completed your journal assignment for this module. Remember, do not start a new document! Build on what you wrote in Modules 1 and 2.
In the last module, you explored material of your peers. Throughout the modules, you are collecting ideas, resources, and links to different sources of information. For this module you are going to find a resource that is NOT one you would recommend your peers use. Share the resource and/or link, and tell us why you think it is not a good resource.
Selected Readings
Choose two readings. All readings are available through the CCCOnline Library in CINAHL Plus With Full Text.
Dirkes, S. M. (2016). Acute kidney injury vs acute renal failure. Critical Care Nurse, 36(6), 75-76. doi:10.4037/ccn2016170
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Campbell, N. (2016). Innovations to support hydration care across health and social care. British Journal of Community Nursing, 21(Sup7): S24-S29.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Herschorn, S. (2013). Challenges in lower urinary tract and pelvic floor disorders: Where do we go from here? Canadian Urological Association Journal, 7(9/10 Suppl. 4), S208. doi:10.5489/cuaj.1629
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Köse, A., Armağan, E., Öner, N., Köksal, Ö., Mert, D. K., Özdemir, F., & Aydın, Ş. A. (2014). Acid-base disorders in the emergency department: Incidence, etiologies and outcomes. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(1), 4-9. doi:10.5152/jaem.2014.27880
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Quinlan, M. (1982). Solving the mysteries of calcium imbalance: An action guide. RN, 45(11), 50-100.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Skakkebaek, N. E., et al. (2016). Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility. Physiological Reviews, 96(1), 55.
Access this article through the CCCOnline Library permalink.
Importance of active professional organization participation by nurses referencing the textbook
& a minimum of two other professional literature.
Identification of two professional nursing organizations you plan to join following BSN
graduation. Description of the mission, goals, advocacies, and legislations supported.
Must be APA 7 style.
Please use as one of the sources the textbook attached in files, Leading and Managing in Nursing by Patricia S. Yoder-Wise.
The additional sources must be peered reviewed and not older than 5 years (2017-2018)
Discussion 4 – Using Data Evaluate Current Practice and Create Recommendations
CLO 6 is assessed using this discussion.
So far this semester, you have identified a clinical question, created a PICO, collected data related to the PICO, organized that data and written it in academic format (Annotated Bibliography), and gotten to know your group members better (Discussion 3). In this discussion, you will move to the next step of identifying implications for practice or recommendations for moving forward with your topic – a focus on quality improvement.
Discussion Objectives:
• Using the literature gathered on the PICO topic, identify whether the evidence supports continued adoption of the current practice or if the practice should be adapted or abandoned.
• Identify current professional guidelines related to the clinical question topic.
• Develop recommendations for practice based on the data discovered in the literature review process.
• Describe the evaluation process and staff education necessary to promote implementation of change in the current practice protocol.
In your initial post for this week, answer the following questions:
1. What is your PICO question?
2. Share the existing professional guidelines that are currently adopted for your PICO. Look at the AHRQ website, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and other national healthcare guidelines from a reputable resource. What do they say? (Remember that the sources you use to answer this question will need to be included in the reference list at the bottom of your initial post.)
3. Using information gathered from your PICO literature review, share your recommendation for practice. Tell me what you would do if you were making the decision on what should change (or remain the same) in current practice with the information you’ve gathered on your group topic. For example, if you’re exploring the use of CHG baths and their effect on CLABSI rates, now that you’ve compiled research data, would you implement them as a standard practice on your unit, or not? How frequently should they be used? Think about what other details should be considered if you were establishing a new policy for your topic or revising an existing policy.
•
o Answer ONE of the following questions below:
Option 1: Do you believe the current practice should continue as currently adopted? If so, why?
Option 2: Should the current practice be adapted or abandoned altogether? If you made the decisions for practice based on your research, what would you do? Why?
4. Describe an evaluation plan for your recommendations for practice to determine if your changes are effective.
•
o Answer ONE of the question sets below based on your plan
Option 1: If you chose to adapt or abandon the existing practice, you will discuss how you would go about implementing a practice change. What data will you need to collect, and how will you collect the data? What timeframe do you propose? How will you know if there is an improvement after implementation?
Option 2: If you chose to continue using the practice currently adopted, discuss completion of a project to assess staff compliance. What data will you need to collect, and how will you collect the data? What timeframe do you propose? How will you know if there is an improvement after implementation of the project?
5. Discuss how you will educate your peers in the clinical environment about the new, revised, or continuing practice. What process will you use for education? How will you determine if the education is effective?
Peer Interaction: You will reply to two other students’ posts with this discussion. A scholarly source is not required for the replies on this discussion, and APA formatting will only be graded on the initial post.
Make sure you refer to the Discussion Grading Rubric below for details on how this discussion will be graded.
Discussion 4 – Using Data Evaluate Current Practice and Create Recommendations
CLO 6 is assessed using this discussion.
So far this semester, you have identified a clinical question, created a PICO, collected data related to the PICO, organized that data and written it in academic format (Annotated Bibliography), and gotten to know your group members better (Discussion 3). In this discussion, you will move to the next step of identifying implications for practice or recommendations for moving forward with your topic – a focus on quality improvement.
Discussion Objectives:
• Using the literature gathered on the PICO topic, identify whether the evidence supports continued adoption of the current practice or if the practice should be adapted or abandoned.
• Identify current professional guidelines related to the clinical question topic.
• Develop recommendations for practice based on the data discovered in the literature review process.
• Describe the evaluation process and staff education necessary to promote implementation of change in the current practice protocol.
In your initial post for this week, answer the following questions:
1. What is your PICO question?
2. Share the existing professional guidelines that are currently adopted for your PICO. Look at the AHRQ website, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and other national healthcare guidelines from a reputable resource. What do they say? (Remember that the sources you use to answer this question will need to be included in the reference list at the bottom of your initial post.)
3. Using information gathered from your PICO literature review, share your recommendation for practice. Tell me what you would do if you were making the decision on what should change (or remain the same) in current practice with the information you’ve gathered on your group topic. For example, if you’re exploring the use of CHG baths and their effect on CLABSI rates, now that you’ve compiled research data, would you implement them as a standard practice on your unit, or not? How frequently should they be used? Think about what other details should be considered if you were establishing a new policy for your topic or revising an existing policy.
•
o Answer ONE of the following questions below:
Option 1: Do you believe the current practice should continue as currently adopted? If so, why?
Option 2: Should the current practice be adapted or abandoned altogether? If you made the decisions for practice based on your research, what would you do? Why?
4. Describe an evaluation plan for your recommendations for practice to determine if your changes are effective.
•
o Answer ONE of the question sets below based on your plan
Option 1: If you chose to adapt or abandon the existing practice, you will discuss how you would go about implementing a practice change. What data will you need to collect, and how will you collect the data? What timeframe do you propose? How will you know if there is an improvement after implementation?
Option 2: If you chose to continue using the practice currently adopted, discuss completion of a project to assess staff compliance. What data will you need to collect, and how will you collect the data? What timeframe do you propose? How will you know if there is an improvement after implementation of the project?
5. Discuss how you will educate your peers in the clinical environment about the new, revised, or continuing practice. What process will you use for education? How will you determine if the education is effective?
Peer Interaction: You will reply to two other students’ posts with this discussion. A scholarly source is not required for the replies on this discussion, and APA formatting will only be graded on the initial post.
Make sure you refer to the Discussion Grading Rubric below for details on how this discussion will be graded.
I have posted several templets and samples on how to analyze and critique a systemic review article. all the data needs to be looked at and summarized.
Do not answer the critique questions using sentence fragments or outline format,
rather, write this critique in paragraph format. Please re-read and spellcheck your
paper before submission
This is the Article that need to be examined and critiqued.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356124/
1) Locate a QUALITATIVE research article on any nursing topic and attach the article with the submission. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, LITERATURE REVIEWS, META-ANALYSIS, and META-SYNTHESIS are not appropriate for this assignment. It needs to be an article of a single qualitative research study.Provide an APA reference for the article. (10 points).
2) Identify the type of qualitative research (ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, etc.). Were the research methods congruent with the research tradition? For example, in an ethnography, the author(s) should discuss culture and in a phenomenology study, the author(s) should discuss the lived experience of something. (20 points).
3) What were the findings of the research study? What are the implications for clinical practice or future nursing research? (20 points).